Need a laugh? "The Radicati view of 2004 and 2005"
Category Opinion
Bookmark :
Well, we all know about the, ahem, "analysis" of Dr. Sara Radicati's merry band of
Well, never one to miss an opportunity to take shots and spew crap, Dr. Radicati has foisted some new tripe on the media in the guise of her "view of 2004 and 2005". Since educated readers like you don't look to anything Radicati has to say for any real value, we can instead take it for what it truly is - entertainment, kinda like the "best dressed" and "sexiest man alive" lists that come out each year. In her entertainment piece she begins with some "duh" observations of the year past, such as:
1. The introduction of Google's email service, Gmail, offers 2GB of free storage. The beta was released on April Fool's Day, leaving many to believe it was a joke. The announcement kicked the Webmail market into high gear - other providers were forced to rethink their free-to-fee based business model, increase storage quotas, and find new ways to attract and keep subscribers.
...
5. RSS technology becomes commonplace, allowing anyone with a web site the ability to syndicate content. A flurry of RSS aggregators emerge, giving users the ability to read web content in a fashion similar to email.
...
10. The Mozilla Foundation's Firefox browser, and a host of others emerged as a legitimate threat to Internet Explorer, which hasn't seen a new release since 2001 and is increasingly perceived as an insecure, outdated browser.
1. Yep, everyone knows Gmail is huge. Anytime a competitor comes into the marketplace and beats you on service, features, etc. you have to respond to be competitive, and that's what competitors such as Hotmail and Yahoo did.
5. RSS is a great technology, but it really isn't new. Blogs have made RSS big, and news agencies are realizing how useful it is to disseminate news. The important thing here is that blogs are the reason that RSS has taken off - keep this in mind.
10. Firefox was realeased this year, after being in beta for quite some time. IE is slipping because of the reasons stated. I am not sure that many other browsers are gaining a foothold - the statistics from my blog indicate that IE is dropping, Mozilla/Firefox/Netscape is gaining, and the others are staying the same.
Now let's take a look at the fun stuff - Dr. Radicati's "predictions" for 2005. This is where we enter into the land of the absurd...
1. We expect IBM Lotus Notes/Domino to continue losing market share to MS Exchange and other players.
...
3. Blogging will fade away from the corporate world and be considered a consumer tool, no longer a credible source of news.
4. Microsoft will speed up development on the next version of Internet Explorer, and release an update before Longhorn (the current plan is to release the next version of IE with Longhorn in 2006).
...
1. Well, Dr. Radicati is going to continue to state this, since I would surmise a large portion of her paycheck comes from M$. Whom else is going to fund her "research"? Her credibility is pretty much washed up after this last year, so she needs to continue sucking up to M$ to stay employed. Oh, and from what I can gather from friends at IBM, the Lotus Software group had a pretty good year - I think the continued investment in Lotus Notes/Domino backs that up.
3. Wishful thinking, Dr. Radicati. You hope blogs go away, since blogs are what exposed you and your organization for what you are - a paper-based infomercial producer. Blogging will continue to thrive, even in the corporate space. Granted, some common rules will most likely develop to help corporations manage the information produced by blogs, but blogs have proven to provide an intimacy and immediacy of information never before seen. Blogs are a primary way that many corporations "reach out" to their customer base, and I believe that this trend will continue. Plus, as mentioned before in this same piece - RSS readers and aggregators have become mainstream, and since this is the case it is now more easier than ever for corporations to maintain a connection to their customer base through the use of corporate and personal blogs.
4. Once again, nice hand licking. M$ had better update IE sooner than later, or they will continue to lose market share. However, with the continuing changes in the M$ product roadmap, I am not sure if M$ will even make 2006 for releasing a meaningful update to IE. One of the main problems I believe they will have is updating something that they worked so hard to integrate into the OS. Fundamental architecture changes to IE - which is what is needed to truly update it to be competitive - will in all likelihood require major changes to the underlying OS as well. That, or M$ will need to split IE out from the OS again, something I believe they are reticent to do. I believe that we won't see an update to IE until the next major OS release - and I don't think M$ even knows when they'll be able to pull that off.
So, take a look at the piece for yourself, and let me know what you think. What are your predictions for 2005?
BTW, thanks to Vowe for pointing out this entertainment article.
Rock
**When life hands you lemons, ask for a bottle of tequila and salt.







Blog Roll









Comments
But even the "objective" (i.e. non-sponsored or self-funded) reports by such firms as the Burton Group are still simply opinion and conjecture. Granted, these reports are most likely "informed" opinions by trained analysts, but they are still an "educated guess" at best.
Brill's log is not a great example of a "Technologically deep" blog. In fact, Ed's blog serves more to provide a snapshot into the thoughts of IBM. What do they think of what is happening in the marketplace? How are they responding? It also helps the mid-level IT manager that has a vested interest in, say, Lotus Notes/Domino to be able to battle "airplace magazine management" that claims (for the umpteenth time) that "Notes is dead". So, while I wouldn't base investment decisions on Brill's blog, I would definitely use it to protect my "investment" in the Notes/Domino platform.
When it comes to investments should you put too much weight into any piece of information you have? Shouldn't you (and possibly with the help of your broker) take in all the information you can, assign a proper "weight" to it, and then base your investment decisions upon the information gathered?
And if we're talking about capital investments for a platform, then I would argue that you should let the needs of your business decide the best platform to use - the choose the best platform based on those needs. And here's where we may differ a bit - I think that personal and corporate blogs may not be a great primary source of information for making these types of decisions, but I do feel that you can use them to get a "pulse" on that platform: What is the community around that platform like? Is it thriving? Are they talking about innovations, or are they bitching about problems? What types of innovations are being discussed in the corporate blogs? Are they always on the defensive because they feel under attack? Or are they talking about what's next, what's new, and how they expect you to use it? Overall, does the community seem to be healthy and thriving? I submit that a sick community points to a sick platform, and should be avoided.
So, overall I think we're in the same boat, Axel. But I do want to stress that I feel sponsored analyst reports are possibly worse than blogs and other news media. Why? Because they truly are paper-based infomercials - the insidious type of infomercial that is made to look like one thing (a talk show, an interview, etc. - or an objective analyst report) but in reality the goal is to foist something upon you - to sell you some snake oil.
Rock
Posted by Rock At 08:07:54 AM On 01/12/2005 | - Website - |
How about Sam Ruby? www.intertwingly.net That's an IBMer writing a techie blog. I don't read it much, but I'm not much of a techie anymore myself (and thus, don't promise a "techie blog").
Anyway, blogs are all texture to the overall market conversation. Sometimes they are the main focus, sometimes they are the background. It's all good.
Posted by Ed Brill At 09:35:22 AM On 01/12/2005 | - Website - |
Every piece of information, even such paistakenly elaborated texts like that of true intelectual Ted Neward ("Effective Enterprise Java") contain subjective information.
More so for corporate blogging like that of Ed Brill or analys from Radicati Group sponsored by vendors.
I don't take too seriously both. Question: Isn't the "intimidacy" blogging provides mixed with corporation interests like that of IBM or Radicati anti-analystic in nature?
How technologically deep are such blogs as for example that of Ed Brill? Would you base investment decisions on it?
Blogs are different. Some are openly satyrical like that of Hani Suleiman, others try to forge some group spirit like that of Ed Brill others are very technical but not objective like that of Rick Hightower.
To make investment decisions one has to consult a lot of information. Blogs are more quick writing. To get a more realistic picture of reality I prefer more dense and painstakenly elaborated information like that of Ted Neward book. Or trying things out for myself. Information gathering will - for gods sake - not become easier through blogging.
Blogs can give you some links to new technologies. Blogs are funny. But they can also steal your time. Same holds true for Radicati Analysis.
Axel
Posted by Axel Janssen At 05:44:27 AM On 01/12/2005 | - Website - |
if those blogs are seen primalaraly as marketing tools, where talking about problems is seen as bitching about problems I predict that the Radicati study is right. None is interested in this kind of stuff.
I am going back to theserverside.NET, atnotes.de and javaranch.
IT will need another crisis, before they learn their lesson, me thinks.
If users and young developers are seen as dump marketing targets, the whole thing will shoot back in the end.
Axel
Posted by At 07:09:25 AM On 01/14/2005 | - Website - |